Chapter 1 - Introduction to Modern Production Data Analysis

1.01 Introduction to Modern Production Data Analysis (21 min.)

Chapter 2 - Fundamentals of Rate Transient Analysis

2.01 Pressure Transient Analysis Fundamentals (27 min.) Quiz: 2.01 Pressure Transient Analysis Fundamentals
2.02 Flow Regimes (13 min.) Quiz: 2.02 Flow Regimes
2.03 Region of Investigation (10 min.) Quiz: 2.03 Region of Investigation
2.04 RTA 101 - The Conceptual Production Decline Curve (19 min.) Quiz: 2.04 RTA 101 - The Conceptual Production Decline Curve
2.05 Flowing Material Balance 1 - Single Phase Oil (22 min.) Quiz: 2.05 Flowing Material Balance 1 - Single Phase Oil
2.05.a Multiphase Flowing Material Balance (38 min.)
2.05.b Conservation of Mass and Pseudo Pressure Derivation (31 min.)
2.05.c Pseudo Pressure Calculations & Saturation Pressure Relationship Part I (21 min.)
2.05.d Pseudo Pressure Calculations & Saturation Pressure Relationship Part II (29 min.)
2.05.e Multiphase Material Balance Equation (33 min.)
2.06 Fluid Flow Solutions as Decline Equations (11 min.) Quiz: 2.06 Fluid Flow Solutions as Decline Equations
2.07 Type Curves (10 min.) Quiz: 2.07 Type Curves
2.08 Principle of Superposition (30 min.) Quiz: 2.08 Principle of Superposition
2.09.a Managing Pressure Dependent Rock and Fluid Properties - Gas Properties (13 min.)
2.09.b Managing Pressure Dependent Rock and Fluid Properties – Pseudo Pressure (10 min.)
2.09.c Managing Pressure Dependent Rock and Fluid Properties - Pseudo-Time (15 min.)
2.09.d Managing Pressure Dependent Rock and Fluid Properties - Advanced Formulations (7 min.) Quiz: 2.09.d Managing Pressure Dependent Rock and Fluid Properties - Advanced Formulations
2.10 The Flowing Material Balance II – Single Phase Gas (8 min.) Quiz: 2.10 The Flowing Material Balance II – Single Phase Gas
2.11 Modeling and Forecasting (25 min.) Quiz: 2.11 Modeling and Forecasting

Chapter 3 - Analyzing Low Permeability, Fractured Reservoirs

3.01 Introduction to Unconventional Resources (32 min.) Quiz: 3.01 Introduction to Unconventional Resources
3.02 Permeability, Surface Area and Stimulated Reservoir Volume (20 min.) Sample Lesson Quiz: 3.02 Permeability, Surface Area and Stimulated Reservoir Volume
3.03 Simple RTA Methods for Unconventional Reservoirs (17 min.) Quiz: 3.03 Simple RTA Methods for Unconventional Reservoirs
3.04 Type Curve Analysis for Unconventional Reservoirs (11 min.)
3.05 Stress Dependent Permeability (12 min.)
3.06 Flowing Material Balance III - Multiphase Flow (18 min.)
3.07 Common RTA Models for Unconventional Reservoirs (25 min.)

Chapter 4 - Probabilistic Rate Transient Analysis

4.01 Introduction (25 min.)
4.02 Probabilistic Type Curves I- Empirical Type Curves (31 min.)
4.03 Probabilistic Type Curves II- Model-based Type Curves (18 min.)
4.04 Probabilistic Modeling I- Monte Carlo Simulation (15 min.)
4.05 Sampling the Parameter Space (40 min.)
4.06 Probabilistic Modeling II - Probabilistic History Matching (24 min.)

Chapter 5 - RTA Case Studies

5.01 Dry Gas - Marcellus Example (26 min.) Quiz: 5.01 Dry Gas - Marcellus Example
5.02 Gas Condensate - Montney Example (13 min.) Quiz: 5.02 Gas Condensate - Montney Example
5.03 Black Oil - Bakken Example (19 min.) Quiz: 5.03 Black Oil - Bakken Example
5.04a Volatile Oil - Eagle Ford Example Part I (18 min.)
5.04b Volatile Oil - Eagle Ford Example Part II (25 min.)
5.05a Stress Sensitive Reservoirs - Haynesville Example Part I (11 min.)
5.05b Stress Sensitive Reservoirs - Haynesville Example Part II (17 min.)

Rate Transient Analysis (RTA) / Chapter 1 - Introduction to Modern Production Data Analysis

Lesson 3.02 Permeability, Surface Area and Stimulated Reservoir Volume

Access All SAGA Wisdom Training content Subscribe

Already a member? Sign in

Access All SAGA Wisdom Training content Subscribe

Already a member? Sign in

Transcript

01. Learning Objectives 02. Flow Regimes in Unconventional Reservoirs 03. How Does Exposed Surface Area Influence Production Rate 04. How Does Exposed Surface Area Influence Production Rate 05. Compartmentalization - Multi-stage Fracturing 06. Multi-Stage Fractured Horizontal vs Vertical Fractured Well -- Observed Performance 07. Multi-Stage Fractured Horizontal Observed Performance 08. Simulated Reservoir Volume (SRV) Concept 09. Illustration of SRV Concept Using Simulated Production 10. Surface Area and SRV 11. Surface Area and SRV (cont'd.)12. Impact of Increased Surface Area on Performance and Reserves 13. Impact of Increased SRV on Performance and Reserves 14. Concept of Production-Measured Permeability (Effective Permeability)15. Effective Permeability Around a Horizontal Well 16. Effective Permeability Around a Horizontal Well (cont'd.)17. Effective Permeability Around a Horizontal Well (cont'd.)18. Effective Permeability Around a Hydraulic Fracture

01. Learning Objectives

The learning objectives for this session are to talk about some of the fundamental production drivers in unconventionals. Namely surface area and (SRV). We're gonna start by reviewing the that occur in conventional versus unconventionals. And then we're going to get into a discussion specifically about how surface area can compensate for low permeability. And it has to do this in unconventionals, that's the only way that these reservoirs can be economic. We're going to talk about howcompartmentalization can efficiently allow us to create an enormous effective surface area in a horizontal well, something that simply can't be done in a vertical well. And so this is part of the reason why almost all wells that are drilled in shales and tight reservoir rocks now are multi-stage horizontal wells. We're going to explain the concept of the stimulated reservoir volume which is obviously a huge driver of in unconventionals. And we're going to describe how surface area and influence well performance and EUR. This is a critical component. Once we have a fundamental understanding of that, we'll be able to go forward and do some analysis which will be the next lesson. And then finally we're gonna talk about production measured oras opposed to a permeability that you would measure in a laboratory. So there's some very clear differences between these two, and we want to talk about what those are.

02. Flow Regimes in Unconventional Reservoirs

So let's review the first of all. As everybody should be fully aware now, when you're talking about conventional vertical wells even wells that are fractured, because usually the fractures will be small in comparison to the external reservoir boundaries, you're typically dealing with. So this is where we have a flow path that's convergent on the well, the transport medium is the pore space; the connected pore space. When we get into unconventionals we're almost always going to see. Not 100% of the time but it's going to be a dominant flow regime. We're going to see linear flow from the formation into the fracture. That transport medium is going to be the fractures, we get very little flow occurring in the matrix because we're talking about extremely tight rock, and there's a very high contrast between matrix and fracture connectivity. So we commonly call these but linear flow is going to be an overriding characteristic of these systems.

03. How Does Exposed Surface Area Influence Production Rate

Okay what I'd like to do is a little bit of a thought experiment and we're going to show how exposed surface area can influence production rate. So on the left hand side we have our standard radial system, conventional system. And this equation here which you've seen before is the steady state inflow equation for a radial system. So this is the steady state production rate, stabilized production rate that we would expect given a pressure difference of down to flowing pressure and over here on the right hand side we have a system. So this could be thought of as a horizontal well or a verticalor a multi-frac'd horizontal well. And the equation that describes the flow into that bounded linear system looks like this. And so what I would like to do in the thought experiment is to say, the radial system as a conventional reservoir is going to be 1 millidarcy (mD) of permeability and the linear system is going to be 1000 times lower than that. And we want to ensure that these things have the same flow rate. So what do we need to do in terms of extending the available surface area so that these two systems will be equivalent and have the same flow rate? And that's a good way of thinking about how in unconventionals we can design a wellthat will be economic. It will allow us to produce the same rate that an equivalent 1 mD rock in a conventional reservoir would allow us to produce.

04. How Does Exposed Surface Area Influence Production Rate

So to equate these two things we're just looking at these two components of the equation for flow rate. And because the system is going to be a 1,000 times lower permeability we're going to have that 1,000 coming in there. And for aarea 160 acres, that's a quarter section, we're going to find out what that looks like for a radial system and what that looks like for a linear system. So for a radial system we have a radius of 1489 ft. And for a linear system we have a total square footage of 1.7 and change million square feet. So we're making equivalent drainage sizes in terms of the area. But of course the shape is going to be entirely different between these two. So the first thing that we've figured out by equating these two terms is that the ratio of X to Y, in other words the ratio of the length of the linear system to the width of the linear system is almost 84 times. So that's going to mean that our X distance is about 12,000 ft in our Y distance is about 144 ft.

05. Compartmentalization - Multi-stage Fracturing

So let's take a look at what that looks like as a linear system. If we were trying to design this as a single verticalwe would have a 12,000 ft and so more than 24,000 ft in total distance of this fracture. That is highly impractical. Even if you could design something like that, it would be impractical to develop your field that way. And most experts would agree that you probably couldn't make an/producing fracture that large or that long. So what we're gonna do is we're going to break that up into components and use a horizontal well that's less length and compartmentalize it. So create the same total fracture area using for example a 10,000 ft lateral with 18 fractures and xfs of 660 ft, that's one way to do it. There could be other solutions that could accomplish the same thing. This will give us the equivalent stabilized rate. So this explains in a nutshell how compartmentalization or multi-stage fracturing has allowed us to take somewhat of an impractical field development scenario and turn it into something that's much more practical and doable. And so this is why the industry has been successful in exploiting these resources is because we're creating these compartmentalized solutions.

06. Multi-Stage Fractured Horizontal vs Vertical Fractured Well -- Observed Performance

Here's an example of real and so what you're looking at here is a multi staged horizontal well versus a single vertical fractured well. And their behaviors, on the log log plot shown over here, couldn't be more different. So if we look at first of all the multi-stage horizontal well what we see is after about18 days we transition from; b = 2 into something that looks like very quickly. So that's our horizontal well. When we look at the vertical well with one single fracture, we have 200 months which is more than just about 17 years of production where we don't see any evidence of boundaries. So if you think about this in terms of efficiency, the horizontal well is draining its area much more efficiently than the vertical well is. You're getting those resources out a lot faster. So these are real examples of horizontal versus vertical wells. It just shows the value of compartmentalization and how it's able to accelerate that resource recovery and create production scenarios that are much more economic.

07. Multi-Stage Fractured Horizontal Observed Performance

Here's another example to further illustrate this point. What you're looking at here are normalized rate responses on a log-log plot for 50 Eagleford gas wells. And each one of these has about 2-3 years of production. And so the interesting thing to consider here is that these all start with a half slope so you show your early behavior and they all transition into something that's very close to; a slope of 1. It looks like boundary dominating flow, but the interesting thing about this is you might think that that boundary dominating flow would be the extents of the reservoir. In fact it is not, in almost all of these cases, it's an area orvolume that's significantly smaller than the available drainage volume due to well spacing. This is a very important observation because what it tells us is that we're not draining the inter well spacing in a lot of these wells. Especially in these 50 that we're looking at here. These drainage volumes are very small and so you're really only draining something that's potentially very close to that wellbore.

08. Simulated Reservoir Volume (SRV) Concept

So we come up with this idea of the concept and that's largely come about as a result of observation in the field. There are many of many such examples of these wells that drain limited areas. So the stimulated reservoir volume refers to the that is in immediate contact with thes. And that's typically going to be applicable to a or gas. A very tight rock, nanodarcy permeability type rock. It's a convenient concept for because it simplifies the production analysis problem significantly. So this shows you some examples. This is what an might look like in reality, the way we typically are going to model them is as a system such as what you see on the right hand side. So here's an example using a simulation we can illustrate the concept of SRV very clearly using the simulation. We start with a nanodarcy rock such as a shale. This one happens to be 50 nD.

09. Illustration of SRV Concept Using Simulated Production

And what you're seeing here is the simulation of production response from two distinct reservoirs. One in which theexists in a semi-infinite or but it's but it's much larger than that than the stimulated reservoir volume. And the other one where the reservoir boundaries coincide precisely with the. And what this teaches us is that looking at the timescale here, this is more than 5 years, they're almost identical. There's very little difference between the case where the completion exists in a larger reservoir and where it exists in a limited reservoir. So the contribution of oil and gas outside the immediate fractured region is negligible in many of these cases. And that's why the stimulated reservoir volume concept works.

10. Surface Area and SRV

We talked about. I want to tie together now surface area and stimulated reservoir volume. So what you're looking at here, you can consider this sort of a general rock volume that has some fractures in it. And the stimulated reservoir volume can be thought of as the bulk volume multiplied by the hydrocarbon filled at standard conditions. The surface area would be the total connected fracture area within that. Those in many cases can be completely independent parameters. If we're looking at just geology in general, you could have stimulated volume that has sparse fractures or he could have stimulated volume that's got much much more dense fractures, and the orientation of those fractures varies as well. So generally speaking there's no obvious relationship between the stimulated reservoir volume and the surface area.

11. Surface Area and SRV (cont'd.)

However when we talk about a compartmentalizedwhere we can control where we're placing the fractures, we can infer usually with pretty good reliability a relationship between the and the total connected surface area. So our assumption that we're going to have to make to do this to make this work is that the fractures are planar and parallel and they have uniform size and distribution. So we're talking about a, I sometimes call this a shoe box model, it's shaped like a box it has a length of L (horizontal well length) a height of H and then a stimulated reservoir width that's gonna be double the fracture (xf). Because we're assuming that those fractures are penetrating perpendicularly from the horizontal well into the reservoir.

12. Impact of Increased Surface Area on Performance and Reserves

So what I what I'd like to show here is the impact of surface area on well performance and. So what you're looking at here is a plot of production rate versus cumulative production. And we have the same reservoir rock, this is just simulated data, but we're gonna look at this for 12 stages, 24 stages, 48 stages and 96 stages. And if you're paying attention the stage count is doubling each time, but the is staying constant. So what we're showing here is what happens when you keep constant but you increase your total connected surface area. In other words you're increasing your compartmentalization, you're increasing the amount of fracturing that's occurring within that stimulated reservoir volume. What happens is very clear when you look at it, your overallvalue is not going to change appreciably. All of these rate versus cums are converging, and this is only a 5 year forecast, are converging at the same number at about 130,000 barrels. So the addition of more surface area on its own doesn't add reserves, all it does is it adds stabilized productivity. So it can increase your production rate but it doesn't really affect your reserve recovery.

13. Impact of Increased SRV on Performance and Reserves

If we look at this in a different way, and now what we want to do is keep the surface area the same but increase the, the exact opposite thing happens. So in this case what we're doing to increase the SRV and keep the surface area the same is we're varying the size of each treatment. So we have very short fracs with 96 stages that has the same surface area as half the number of stages but double the frac length and so on and so on. So in this case what we see is the 12 stage scenario actually is going to have the bestrecovery because it's got the largest SRV. So we've done the exact opposite here, we've preserved total surface area, but we've made the SRV double in size each time. Now that's one way to make SRV get larger. The other way to make SRV increase in size is of course to extend the horizontal well link that would be the other way to do this. So this is just one possible scenario. I could have the same treatment size and same number of stages but make the horizontal well longer, that same result would be expected under those conditions. So if you have the same number of stages the same treatment but extend your horizontal well length, what should happen is something very similar to this. So what do we see here. Well we see because the surface area is held constant, total production rate of all of these scenarios is identical at the beginning and the EURs of each case are going to change. So SRV is directly correlated with EUR but does not impact production rate unless the surface area is also increased. So if surface area and SRV are increased then you're going to have an impact on production rate and and recovery. So the way these two components impact performance now is very clear.Nobakht M., Mattar L., Moghadam S. and Anderson D.M. 2010. Simplified Yet Rigorous Forecasting of Tight/Shale Gas Production in Linear Flow. SPE 133615 presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Anaheim, California, 27-29 May.

14. Concept of Production-Measured Permeability (Effective Permeability)

What I want to do now is describe how we can relate surface area in a system to what we would call a production measured or effective permeability. This is a very useful parameter to use because a lot of times we don't know where all those fractures are. So here's an example where we have a connected. We might not know what that total surface area is. So what we're going to do is we're going to come up with an effective permeability. And to do that we define what's called a nominal area. And the nominal area is based on some known of the system. For example the horizontal well length multiplied by h, that would be a nominal area. And theis always going to be larger than the matrix permeability, assuming that your has somehow enhanced the productivity of the system. And it's always going to be less than the permeability fractures, so it's going to be somewhere in between. But it's a combination of fractures and matrix acting together. We can define the effective permeability using this relationship so the A√k comes out of the √t specialized analysis. If we normalize it with that nominal area, we can very quickly and easily calculate that effective permeability.

15. Effective Permeability Around a Horizontal Well

So let's do an example. Anaround a horizontal well with known fractures. And we're gonna assume to make it easy that thepermeability is infinite. So if we have 12 fractures each 500 ft and and a matrix permeability of 0.01 mD, and a 5,000 ft horizontal well length, we're gonna come up with an equivalent or an effective permeability. And we can do that using this definition that we looked at before. So as long as I know the number of stages, theand the matrix permeability I can come up with that effective permeability. In this case it's 0.0058 mD. That's roughly six times the matrix permeability.

16. Effective Permeability Around a Horizontal Well(cont'd.)

So what we end up seeing here is when you have your surface area, and let's say you double your surface area, that results in a 2 to the power 2 increase in effective permeability. So because permeability always occurs under the square root sign, your linear increase in area results in a geometric increase in permeability based on that power sign there. So that's something to keep in mind. Area also impacts directly the production rate. A doubling in area will result in two times production rate. In this case I require four times theto get that doubling in production rate. So the way permeability varies is different than the way surface area varies.

17. Effective Permeability Around a Horizontal Well(cont'd.)

Here's the here's an example of an equivalent multi-frac system and effective permeability. So we have a multi-frac system with 12 fractures and we have a known matrix permeability here. We substitute in here thethat we calculated, and we have absolutely identical production flow rates. So effective permeability is a good functional model that allows us to create a model without having to make assumptions about how much surface area there is connected, we can use this effective permeability concept.

18. Effective Permeability Around a Hydraulic Fracture

The other place wherebecomes very useful is we can take that whole horizontal well and turn it on its side now. Instead of using as our nominal area the horizontal well length we're going to describe the region around each one of thestages as an effective permeability. And that's something that we do very commonly in of unconventionals. In fact we probably use this effective permeability even more so than the one describing it around a horizontal well. For the pure fact that we just simply do not know, when we're looking at this sort of, we have no idea where these fractures are occurring. There's no way to measure there's no way to know how much surface area is being created proximal to the hydraulic fracturing when we're creating one of these stages. So the functional model is to basically represent that with an effective permeability. I mean do it exactly the same way, the only difference here is that the nominal area now is based on the area of that frac length not based on the nominal area of the entire horizontal well. And that's it.